Raw milk stats from the CDC

Bubblingbrooks

Made in Alaska
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
1
Points
139
The key figure that permits a calculation of raw milk illnesses on a per-person basis comes from a 2007 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) FoodNet survey, which found that 3.04 percent of the population consumes raw milk, or about 9.4 million people, based on the 2010 census. This number may in fact be larger in 2011 as raw milk is growing in popularity. For example, sales of raw milk increased 25 percent in California in 2010, while sales of pasteurized milk declined 3 percent.

In addition, Dr. Beals has compiled published reports of illness attributed to raw milk from 1999 to 2010. During the eleven-year period, illnesses attributed to raw milk averaged 42 per year.

Using government figures for foodborne illness for the entire population, Dr. Beals has shown that you are about thirty-five thousand times more likely to get sick from other foods than you are from raw milk, says Fallon Morell. And with good management practices in small grass-based dairies offering fresh unprocessed whole milk for direct human consumption, we may be able to reduce the risk even further.
 

freemotion

Food Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
10,817
Reaction score
90
Points
317
Location
Southwick, MA
Bubblingbrooks said:
For example, sales of raw milk increased 25 percent in California in 2010, while sales of pasteurized milk declined 3 percent.
No wonder there seems to be a crackdown in CA! Follow the money.....

Great statistics!
 

savingdogs

Queen Filksinger
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
5,478
Reaction score
5
Points
221
My freezers are full of my own raw milk....I need to make more cheese I guess!
 

abifae

Abinormal Butterfly
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
5,820
Reaction score
4
Points
198
Location
Colorado
Bubblingbrooks said:
In addition, Dr. Beals has compiled published reports of illness attributed to raw milk from 1999 to 2010. During the eleven-year period, illnesses attributed to raw milk averaged 42 per year.
Do you know what it comes to, compared to pasteurized milk, in illnesses per gallon. Or something else that actually lets you compare?
 

Bubblingbrooks

Made in Alaska
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
1
Points
139
abifae said:
Bubblingbrooks said:
In addition, Dr. Beals has compiled published reports of illness attributed to raw milk from 1999 to 2010. During the eleven-year period, illnesses attributed to raw milk averaged 42 per year.
Do you know what it comes to, compared to pasteurized milk, in illnesses per gallon. Or something else that actually lets you compare?
I would have to dig deep on the CDC site, but check this out!

Then, there is the issue of pasteurized milk, which according to WAPF is responsible for causing hundreds of thousands of illness cases throughout the past several decades, and several hundred deaths. The single largest Salmonella outbreak, in fact, which sickened over 200,000 people and killed 18 people in just a few months, was caused by pasteurized milk, not raw milk.http://www.naturalnews.com/033242_CDC_unpasteurized_milk.html
 

Wifezilla

Low-Carb Queen - RIP: 1963-2021
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
8,928
Reaction score
16
Points
270
Location
Colorado
People with well nourished brains aren't as easy to manipulate. Let people get real nutrition and they will do all kinds of wacky things...like think for themselves. Can't have that! /sarcasm-attack
 
Top