enjoy the ride
Sufficient Life
No- Marketwatch- an internet site, is selling snake oil- which is always a good business in times of trouble.On Our own said:Seriously? The Wall Street Journal is telling people to stockpile and get weapons??
No- Marketwatch- an internet site, is selling snake oil- which is always a good business in times of trouble.On Our own said:Seriously? The Wall Street Journal is telling people to stockpile and get weapons??
All we can do is continue to work towards being as self sufficient as possible. I know I personally have a long way to go but at least I'm working on it.
I agree with hennypenny....SKILLS will prevail in the future, nothing more. We have GOT to up our skills, as well as stockpile. Heirloom seeds, old breeds of livestock, and the old ways of living....that is our survival when this comes to pass.Eh. So some people start stocking up. They still will have no idea how to use their stockpile, and once it's run out, will have no idea how to replenish it. They will have nothing to trade, no skills of any sort. I guess from working with people a lot, I've gotten cynical. I mean, most people couldn't patch a pair of jeans if their life depended on it. So what about growing their own food, storing the food, making their own clothes, preparing for winters, etc, etc? I've been steadily becoming more SS, but without help I doubt I could make it.
I believe in preparation, to the extent that I can. A collapse of the US economy would probably be classified as "low risk, high impact" scenario. A total collapse may have a low chance of happening (personally I'd give it a better than 50% chance), but the impact would be severe if it does. I can prepare by basically doing what I have been doing for years, reducing my reliance on money to get by.enjoy the ride said:Of course the US is in trouble. Much of the world has problems right now. If your car breaks down on the freeway, you're in trouble. But that doesn't mean you are going to die. You might but it is much more likely that everything will be reasonable OK. You will go on.
If you honestly believe that something bad may happen, and that it will affect a lot of people, then I don't believe that the "continuous repeating of warnings" are a bad thing. I don't see your point about the warnings resulting in hysteria. If I were about to unknowingly drive off of a cliff, and someone was shouting and waving their arms to get your attention, It may scare me but I don't that that it would instill hysteria. If that person were wrong, but honestly believed that I had been in danger, I'd thank them for their concern, not be mad at them for scaring me.enjoy the ride said:I have a real problem with continuous repeating of "warnings" that are big on repeating the worse thoughts that have strayed into someone's mind without particulars or solutions. It's like yelling fire in a theater because someone lit a match. The resulting hysteria will result in more damage than could have possibly occured from the incident.
Yes there are problems, but there is a world of difference between useful information to help a person prepare as best they can and screams of hysteria that may ruin any chance of reasonable action that actually can help.
ExactlyIf you honestly believe that something bad may happen, and that it will affect a lot of people, then I don't believe that the "continuous repeating of warnings" are a bad thing. I don't see your point about the warnings resulting in hysteria.