frustratedearthmother
Sustainability Master
Good info ~gd! (you done good, lol)
There is one well-documented try at creating a transgenic genetically modified organism (GMO) in the early 90s--many people refer to the "fish tomato" when they talk about how GMO is messing with nature and evil, however the fish tomato never made it to market: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_tomatoso lucky said:But I know I have read news articles about GMO food that has been created by using genes from a different species to achieve certain qualities. Of course I can't name any of them now, but seems like I recall fish genes being used in some fruit for some quality. Are these experimental only? Or just fairy tales maybe?
Nope I was dead wrong, some idiot managed to transfer a gene from a flounder into a tomato so the tomato could be kept refrigerated to extend its shelf life. The USDA jumped on that pretty hard and it wasnot even allowed to be field tested, it changed the direction of most research projects. The next generation of GMO will not have the transgene in the pollen that could be blown around and it will give the seed producer long term control. A patent is only 17 years but a trade secret is as long as you can keep it secret [KFC, Coke etc]so lucky said:But I know I have read news articles about GMO food that has been created by using genes from a different species to achieve certain qualities. Of course I can't name any of them now, but seems like I recall fish genes being used in some fruit for some quality. Are these experimental only? Or just fairy tales maybe?
Hinotori said:Everything I've read has said they isolated the genes from BT bacteria and added them to the corn to make BT corn. That was the only thing that had popped into my mind right away since we are talking about crops.
No I'm not offended or anything. I just can't find anything that says otherwise even. Well I am in over my head but It seems strange to me that BT is considered ORGANIC when applied by man but Frankenfood if the plant makes it's own! ~gd
ETA. Please if you have something that says otherwise I'd love to read it.
There are those other reasons. Why not point Blaundee toward some resources (e.g., web sites, books) about those?k15n1 said:I have a technical background and a PhD in biochemistry and I'm surprised at the emphasis people put on organic/non-GMO on the basis of health. GMO crops and big-ag are a problem on so many levels. Let's not just talk about the health part. There are economic, moral, historical, and SS reasons to object to GMO.