- Thread starter
- #11
HandledWithCare
Power Conserver
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2012
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 29
I have read plenty of books and short stories that are "challenging" as in big words, meandering sentences and old language etc etc. If you want to read something that is "hard" read anything by HP Lovecraft. I love books like that, and the more difficult the better. Most young adult books are perfectly readable and enjoyable. I'm no book snob at all. Twilight in particular is difficult because I want to abandon it and ignore it's existence. I know to be a good writer--or reader--I have to be willing to read EVERYTHING, willing to struggle through annoying drivel to come out the other side and have a well-informed opinion on it. It is more respectable to list examples of why I don't like something than to simply say "I never got through it. It was bad." and give up. Who knows I may even learn to like it, and that's something I'd never know unless I forced myself past the slow parts.ORChick said:I think if I felt a need for a challenge in reading I might finally read one of the Russian novels, or "Ulysses" by James Joyce - which my English teacher brother has recommended several times (and I have always found something else to read or do when he does ) I like, and still read, a number of books meant for juveniles; nothing wrong with them. But reading a book I cannot like, don't like the writing style, don't think is well written ... IMO that is just a waste of time.
Reading is not a challenge to me at all. I will read all day everyday but I have no discipline for reading something I don't instantly like. This is supposed to be a growing exercise by forcing me to change my routine. I don't think it's a waste of time anymore than going without sugar, biking to work, giving up soda and so on. Also, reading Twilight won't stop me from reading my usual things; I have thirty days to finish a mid-length book and I will space it out in reasonably painless intervals.
HWC