me&thegals
A Major Squash & Pumpkin Lover
It sounds like welfare could use some work. I know in WI our program was revamped years ago. It's called Welfare to Work (or more informally as W2). I might eventually make the time to look into it more, as I have a vague memory that it tried to address some of these welfare issues.VT-Chicklit said:I have no problem with helping those who need help, but you also need to provide a way for those being helped to help themselves. It is sad that these programs trap people into a form of slavery. Many people get stuck in this cycle and cant get off their subsidies. When thay start to do for themselves, they loose all the help they were getting and they are not ready to be able to go it alone with out help. It, in many cases becomes a way of life, from generation to generation. That is not fair. They are unable to share the American Dream.
Yes, absolutely, welfare should be an intermediate help, unless someone is permanently disabled. It's a disgrace that it would be set up in a way that someone is actually penalized for working, even if only earning a little money.