FarmerChick
Super Self-Sufficient
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 11,417
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 248
to me it is not a government takeover.
I guess we see it different.
to me it is govt. help and laws to control ins. companies etc.
if it were a takeover than we would have universal care tomorrow...no choice point blank. that is a takeover to me.
govt helping is not always bad. in monster situations it is required.
the food. sure we need those changes but food is not always WHY people need medical care at ALL. you know genetic problems, immunity problems, accidents, etc. are bigger causes of health care problems when we add them up over food related causes. Sure both are horrible, but just eating right does not ever mean you don't need medical care.
That statement doesn't work for me to warrant not changing the healthcare system radically.
I guess we see it different.
to me it is govt. help and laws to control ins. companies etc.
if it were a takeover than we would have universal care tomorrow...no choice point blank. that is a takeover to me.
govt helping is not always bad. in monster situations it is required.
the food. sure we need those changes but food is not always WHY people need medical care at ALL. you know genetic problems, immunity problems, accidents, etc. are bigger causes of health care problems when we add them up over food related causes. Sure both are horrible, but just eating right does not ever mean you don't need medical care.
That statement doesn't work for me to warrant not changing the healthcare system radically.