Beekissed
Mountain Sage
Dial-up prevented me from viewing the article....anyone care to give a run down?
Really? The motivation is normally love and a big family is not overburdening the planet as much as greed is doing. When the planet's resources are being stripped because of the greed and extravagance of a few as opposed to the resources that may be used by a larger family, then I will take love over greed any day.OrganicKale said:I don't think government should put limits on reproduction. However, I think people should think of the effect they are having on the earth when they continue to reproduce beyond just replacing themselves. I am appalled when people seem to want to have as many kids as they can. Don't they care about what is going to happen to those children and their children's children on this woefully overburdened planet? I don't understand what motivates people to keep churning out kidlets in an overpopulated planet.
Funny you should say that Bee - Yesterday on a local radio show one of the guys said that apparently the recession was not having an affect on the elite. They are still taking their vacations, going to extravagant hotels and demanding more and more high priced extravagant goods. Due to their demands some people are finding niche (is that spelled right) markets and making a fortune off of their wants. He went on to say more about how they have never missed a stride in spending and about that time some one cut me off in traffic and then rear ended the guy in front of us. I was to busy to pay attention. But I would have loved to have heard what he said.Beekissed said:Really? The motivation is normally love and a big family is not overburdening the planet as much as greed is doing. When the planet's resources are being stripped because of the greed and extravagance of a few as opposed to the resources that may be used by a larger family, then I will take love over greed any day.
The U.N. says 7 billion is not a problem; a larger percentage will live in cities and be a part of the workforce. Apparently there are sufficient resources for us all thus far; hopefully we will use them well.When you were born, you were the:
3,881,519,426th
person alive on Earth
78,133,317,813th
person to have lived since history began
Right. There's a huge population bulge in the US. Sadly, they were not self sufficient, so their kids are paying for their retirement.aggieterpkatie said:I don't think the world is over populated. I watched a documentary on population on Discovery or some other network. THey were discussing how our population growth has slowed down and that's a bad thing, especially for our country. When you stop having babies, then there are more retirees than people working, and there's no way social security can survive that. Also, we need younger generations to help stimulate the economy, like buying houses and such. Now that most of the baby boomer generation has bought their houses, there's really not enough of a population of buyers out there to really stimulate the market. There used to be 1 worker supporting about 1-2 retirees, and now it's something like 1 worker for every 4-5 retirees. It was a really interesting show.
According to this bit of information I found on the interwebs (below), lawyers in the USA account for only 0.39% of the population.Wannabefree said:Lawyers would be a bigger reduction, and it would exostentially increase the average persons happiness.Emerald said:Humm..... get rid of the politicians first?BarredBuff said:I think overpopulation will/is a problem but I mean what can you do?