ScottSD
Lovin' The Homestead
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2009
- Messages
- 260
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 84
So...what's with the "*" ?hikerchick said:I couldn't agree more.FarmerChick said:
What does that mean?
So...what's with the "*" ?hikerchick said:I couldn't agree more.FarmerChick said:
I guess she didn't read that far.Mr. Brooks is Roman Catholic and politically independent, and has registered as both a Democrat and a Republican in the past decade. In an interview, he says he set out to write a book about values and philanthropy, with no hidden agenda.
He believes liberal Democrats must ignore their leaders who sometimes disdain charity, and demonstrate that the Democratic Party is still welcoming to people of faith, if they hope to prove that they are, in fact, the more compassionate party.
"This book is a call to action for the left, not a celebration of the right," Mr. Brooks says.
Sounded pretty thorough to me, but it is easier to just trash the messenger than to see the message. Like I said earlier, I was disappointed in my fellow non-believers for being tightwads.Alan J. Abramson, director of the nonprofit-research program at the Aspen Institute, a Washington think tank, questions whether Mr. Brooks is putting too much stock in data on giving, which Mr. Abramson describes as "mushy." He notes that surveys on giving put the percentage of American households who give to charity at between 50 percent and 80 percent an incredibly wide range.
"If somebody called you up and asked you how much you gave last year, God knows what number you would pull out of the air," he says.
Mr. Brooks writes in the appendix that he tried to overcome this problem by using 15 sets of data, based on surveys conducted with individuals in person, over the phone, or through the mail. Every survey led to the same conclusions. "While individual surveys and populations might produce inaccuracies and biases, a large body of evidence is more trustworthy," he writes.
Mr. Abramson also argues that scholars will need to examine the data more closely to determine whether conservative and religious donors are more compassionate which doesn't necessarily follow from giving more.
I didn't get it either.....ScottSD said:So...what's with the "*" ?hikerchick said:I couldn't agree more.FarmerChick said:
What does that mean?
Me thinks they have a little secret language between them.okiegirl1 said:I didn't get it either.....ScottSD said:So...what's with the "*" ?hikerchick said:I couldn't agree more.
What does that mean?