Why not GM?

[ThrottleJockey]

Again with the strawman distractions, you go ahead. I'll go ahead. When you wake up, too bad.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

Next you'll be telling us that cooked food isn't treated as a toxin by the human body right? We've only known this fact for about 100 years, why don't they teach it in nursing school?

My mother is an internal medicine specialist, I followed her education from the start as a teenager both attending her lectures and labs as well as walking her through her notes repeatedly. I have excellent resources in the field and just enough background to be able to call BS when I see it.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

The problem is that you WILL be a statistic. There are no products on your grocers shelf that aren't effected and you'll be hard pressed to find any raised/grown locally that aren't either. People like DC seem to think that unnatural substances need to be proven unsafe before we keep them out of our food supply while intelligent people look at it quite the opposite and would prefer they be PROVEN SAFE before we put them and products of them into every item we consume. They take the strawman approach every time and claim there is no proof that they aren't safe, while in fact there is actually no proof that they ARE safe. Big ag lines the pockets of research firms to study them, publishes portions of the studies that were ended before completion, then claims there is no evidence that they cause problems. While no one is paid to study them full term and the negative findings are buried since there is no profit in telling the WHOLE truth, part of the truth will just have to suffice. Whether you believe in creationism, God, evolution or some twisted combination of all of the above, the simple fact remains that these organisms did not get this way on their own. If these franken plants/animals were better the way we made them, they would have found the path there all on their own long ago rather than having specific methods of keeping this from happening ingrained into their code. One last time, within the century we will see a reduction in human population by about 85-90% and the plan for this is written on the web page of those perpetrating it. The food attacks are an optimum method and through them and the reproductive harm they cause, no one will be the wiser and no one will take the fall. So keep arguing that they haven't been proven unsafe and I'll keep arguing that they haven't been proven safe.

Only one little problem:IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT ANYTHING IS TRULY SAFE! so go back to your cave and roll a big rock to block the opening.

Then try focusing on the concerns outlined. Can you disprove them?

 

[Nifty]

After many reports we are closing this topic. Those of you that remained civil and respectful, we appreciate your participation. Those that took to personal attacks, this is a warning that we do not allow this type of posting style on our community and we will have to remove your posting privileges if you take private issues public.