- Thread starter
- #71
Icu4dzs
Super Self-Sufficient
- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 1,388
- Reaction score
- 59
- Points
- 208
Is it me, or has something changed? Did anybody notice that we just haven't heard anything about Syria lately? Did those folks just make up and quit or did something else becomes more important?
It always amazes me that the mainstream media can't multitask. They seem to glom on to one serious problem and hold onto it for as long as they can with the rest of the things going on the world completely ignored.
What amazes me is the fact that there was something very very ominous going on having to do with the state of South Carolina and in particular the Charleston Harbor with the recent decision not to go to war with Syria. While I am not usually given to "panicking" (in a sense) it does seem a little unusual that there were some nuclear weapons transferred from one state to the state of South Carolina with nobody signing for those weapons.
Then on top of that, Lindsey Graham made strange comments about terrorists possibly getting a hold of nuclear weapons and blowing up the city of Charleston South Carolina. Now I think to myself why would anybody from Al Qaeda or anybody else who doesn't like us use Charleston Harbor rather than something that's much more meaningful to them?
We all know the Charleston Harbor was the site of a place called Fort Sumter. Interestingly enough, as we all know in American history, Fort Sumter was the site of the first shots fired in anger during the Civil War. Does anybody have any question as to why that would be historically uninteresting to people in any country other than ours?
For some reason, I just don't think that anyone outside of this country would use Charleston Harbor or Fort Sumter as their historical Mark in order to wake us up. They did use 9/11 which in fact was very ironic because it is the national distress call phone number on the telephone. If you aren't aware of this happening, all you have to do is conduct a "Google" or any other search engine if you prefer and search the terms "nuclear weapon, South Carolina" and you will find a lot of information about this. Now what could possibly have instigated the movement of any nuclear weapons from ANYWHERE to ANYWHERE ELSE with out proper authority and procedure? I may have been a "snake eater" out in the jungles but I do know that those particular weapons are relatively well guarded and you just don't go moving them around without the "right people" giving the order/approval.
So what WAS going on there? They wanted to go to war in Syria in the worst way and the American People said, NO, they weren't going to get into a war in Syria on the side Al Qaeda was fighting on. That just didn't make a lick of sense. I have heard some pretty wild accusations as to exactly what happened there and how we narrowly avoided "Martial Law" because Charleston, SC didn't get "Nuked". Can anyone imagine the consequences of such an event? Can anyone imagine WHO could have given such an order/approval? Does anyone know who has the "AUTHORITY" to permit such an action? What about doing it WITHOUT appropriate protocol so as to make it sound "terrorist" rather than something even more ominous?
Why does the MSM simply "change the channel" on us. A few weeks ago it was Syria, then it was Obamacare and suddenly they've shifted our "focus" to "making a 'deal' with Iran?" Really" Do we LOOK that STUPID to these liberal bozo's? Do they really think they could pull that sort of stunt and NOT have anyone be aware of their shenanigans? These people scare me. The Al Quaeda guys DON'T. MY OWN people would do such a thing? That is the height of insult and terrorism and they simply think they can blow our hats off with some "diversionary information" and get us to "focus" where they want?
I am able to multitask and since the MSM can NOT, I think it is high time we called them to task and told them to start printing "The TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, so help them,G*D!" Isn't that what we are expected to do when we testify before our fellow countrymen? Why can the media only report "facts" and not require the "FACTS" to be 100% TRUE? It used to be the law that they could only report the truth and THEY got it changed to allow them to report FACTS which can shape public opinion without having to be true! WHAT'S up with that?
Since the MSM is paid HANDSOMELY by whoever wants to distort the information in this country, I think it is high time they be brought in front of the COMMON LAW court and tried for "breach of oath" along with anyone who is paying them to lie to the American people.
I am reading here about people "whispering..." and some even speaking in the open. While I am not sure what they are "whispering about" I am convinced that there are enough people who are annoyed with things that are being done by people who claim to "know what's best" and who claim to "BE IN CHARGE" but are woefully mistaken on both of those issues.
The government of the United States of America is supposed to be, as in the words of Abraham Lincoln, "...Of the people, by the people and For the people..." and those who are employed by the government are simply supposed to be members of society who have been given the privilege of receiving a salary for doing the work of government, not BEING THE KING or "IN CHARGE" of the people...or any such nonsense. EVERYONE who works for the government can be fired and replaced and if they are doing something other than what is permitted by statute (i.e. The Constitution of the United STates of America) they should be immediately fired and replace with someone who DOES perform with in the confines of the STATUTORY LAW that dictates what government employees are supposed to do. There is nothing contained in the Constitution that permits them to "be IN CHARGE" or tell us what to do. That is NOT what their purpose is and any of them that think that need to be fired and replaced...starting with those who make decisions that could endanger the lives of other Americans.
In case no one ever told you (and I'm sure they will disagree) NONE of the members of congress are part of "THE GOVERNMENT" They are employees of the state from which they were sent, to represent the people of that state to the people who administer the government and to tell THEM (i.e. the government) what to do. THEY are NOT THERE TO TELL US what to do. Whoever doesn't get that, please PM me and I'll give them the "source/citation" of LAW which states that.
If we are in perilous times it is because of this fact and we need to get back to what is supposed to be going on. I have been told that our "government" was converted to a "democratic corporation" by some act of 1871. The fact that anything like that has EVER happened is treasonous and if in fact that did happen, it is high time to change it back. The United States of America is not supposed to be a "CORPORATION" and as such that VIOLATES the Constitution of the United States of America and needs to be corrected.
YMMV
It always amazes me that the mainstream media can't multitask. They seem to glom on to one serious problem and hold onto it for as long as they can with the rest of the things going on the world completely ignored.
What amazes me is the fact that there was something very very ominous going on having to do with the state of South Carolina and in particular the Charleston Harbor with the recent decision not to go to war with Syria. While I am not usually given to "panicking" (in a sense) it does seem a little unusual that there were some nuclear weapons transferred from one state to the state of South Carolina with nobody signing for those weapons.
Then on top of that, Lindsey Graham made strange comments about terrorists possibly getting a hold of nuclear weapons and blowing up the city of Charleston South Carolina. Now I think to myself why would anybody from Al Qaeda or anybody else who doesn't like us use Charleston Harbor rather than something that's much more meaningful to them?
We all know the Charleston Harbor was the site of a place called Fort Sumter. Interestingly enough, as we all know in American history, Fort Sumter was the site of the first shots fired in anger during the Civil War. Does anybody have any question as to why that would be historically uninteresting to people in any country other than ours?
For some reason, I just don't think that anyone outside of this country would use Charleston Harbor or Fort Sumter as their historical Mark in order to wake us up. They did use 9/11 which in fact was very ironic because it is the national distress call phone number on the telephone. If you aren't aware of this happening, all you have to do is conduct a "Google" or any other search engine if you prefer and search the terms "nuclear weapon, South Carolina" and you will find a lot of information about this. Now what could possibly have instigated the movement of any nuclear weapons from ANYWHERE to ANYWHERE ELSE with out proper authority and procedure? I may have been a "snake eater" out in the jungles but I do know that those particular weapons are relatively well guarded and you just don't go moving them around without the "right people" giving the order/approval.
So what WAS going on there? They wanted to go to war in Syria in the worst way and the American People said, NO, they weren't going to get into a war in Syria on the side Al Qaeda was fighting on. That just didn't make a lick of sense. I have heard some pretty wild accusations as to exactly what happened there and how we narrowly avoided "Martial Law" because Charleston, SC didn't get "Nuked". Can anyone imagine the consequences of such an event? Can anyone imagine WHO could have given such an order/approval? Does anyone know who has the "AUTHORITY" to permit such an action? What about doing it WITHOUT appropriate protocol so as to make it sound "terrorist" rather than something even more ominous?
Why does the MSM simply "change the channel" on us. A few weeks ago it was Syria, then it was Obamacare and suddenly they've shifted our "focus" to "making a 'deal' with Iran?" Really" Do we LOOK that STUPID to these liberal bozo's? Do they really think they could pull that sort of stunt and NOT have anyone be aware of their shenanigans? These people scare me. The Al Quaeda guys DON'T. MY OWN people would do such a thing? That is the height of insult and terrorism and they simply think they can blow our hats off with some "diversionary information" and get us to "focus" where they want?
I am able to multitask and since the MSM can NOT, I think it is high time we called them to task and told them to start printing "The TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, so help them,G*D!" Isn't that what we are expected to do when we testify before our fellow countrymen? Why can the media only report "facts" and not require the "FACTS" to be 100% TRUE? It used to be the law that they could only report the truth and THEY got it changed to allow them to report FACTS which can shape public opinion without having to be true! WHAT'S up with that?
Since the MSM is paid HANDSOMELY by whoever wants to distort the information in this country, I think it is high time they be brought in front of the COMMON LAW court and tried for "breach of oath" along with anyone who is paying them to lie to the American people.
I am reading here about people "whispering..." and some even speaking in the open. While I am not sure what they are "whispering about" I am convinced that there are enough people who are annoyed with things that are being done by people who claim to "know what's best" and who claim to "BE IN CHARGE" but are woefully mistaken on both of those issues.
The government of the United States of America is supposed to be, as in the words of Abraham Lincoln, "...Of the people, by the people and For the people..." and those who are employed by the government are simply supposed to be members of society who have been given the privilege of receiving a salary for doing the work of government, not BEING THE KING or "IN CHARGE" of the people...or any such nonsense. EVERYONE who works for the government can be fired and replaced and if they are doing something other than what is permitted by statute (i.e. The Constitution of the United STates of America) they should be immediately fired and replace with someone who DOES perform with in the confines of the STATUTORY LAW that dictates what government employees are supposed to do. There is nothing contained in the Constitution that permits them to "be IN CHARGE" or tell us what to do. That is NOT what their purpose is and any of them that think that need to be fired and replaced...starting with those who make decisions that could endanger the lives of other Americans.
In case no one ever told you (and I'm sure they will disagree) NONE of the members of congress are part of "THE GOVERNMENT" They are employees of the state from which they were sent, to represent the people of that state to the people who administer the government and to tell THEM (i.e. the government) what to do. THEY are NOT THERE TO TELL US what to do. Whoever doesn't get that, please PM me and I'll give them the "source/citation" of LAW which states that.
If we are in perilous times it is because of this fact and we need to get back to what is supposed to be going on. I have been told that our "government" was converted to a "democratic corporation" by some act of 1871. The fact that anything like that has EVER happened is treasonous and if in fact that did happen, it is high time to change it back. The United States of America is not supposed to be a "CORPORATION" and as such that VIOLATES the Constitution of the United States of America and needs to be corrected.
YMMV
Hey moxie! Yep, take me out in the first round, too.
