patandchickens
Crazy Cat Lady
That is a big can o' worms there, you knowNikki28 said:So regarding Pitocin I didn't see it mentioned that it was used in the home birthing... is there any reason that they give it so much at the hospital?
First of all, Pitocin and any other contraction-inducing-or-strengthening drugs are not used in homebirths because midwives are not generally allowed to prescribe serious drugs [details depend on type of midwife and jurisdiction, but this is at least 96% accurate as a generalization..
Secondly, though, there are a lot of *bad* effects that Pitocin etc can produce and you would want to have further medical support available if necessary. There is pretty strong evidence that Pitocin etc is, how to say this politely, often used at times when it is either unwarranted or actively counterproductive, thus setting off a whole cascade of further, ever-larger pharmaceutical and/or surgical interventions. For instance if someone arrives at the hospital not really in serious labor, but the hospital figures they're there now so may's well go ahead and have the baby anyhow, the woman is unlikely to "make" the hospital's schedule of how fast her cervix is Supposed To dilate. (Because, duh, of not actually being IN that part of labor in the first place, and also there is evidently just quite a lot of normal variation in the rate/fashion in which different births proceed. The derivation of typical hospital timetables is NOT based on good evidence). Also, going to a hospital can in and of itself put a dent in the progression of labor, as certainly can typical hospital things like staying in one place or lying down. So that doesn't help either.
Thus, after a while the woman, despite her body not actually being in serious labor yet, is dubbed "failing to progress" and Pitocin etc is given. This increases the strength/frequency of the contractions (well, it is intended to anyhow - if it doesn,t, the dose is generally upped til it does). However if the baby is not in the right position and in the right part of the womb to start getting born, or if the body is just not READY to go into labor, having harder contractions does not necessarily do any good, just hurts like hell and wears the woman out. At this point an epidural is often administered. Unfortunately epidurals have been shown to slow down the progress of labor, possibly inherently and certainly because of how they generally require the woman to lie still on her back on the bed. (Epidurals are also associated with poorer outcomes for the baby, apparently even when you factor out higher-risk situations and just look at totally elective epidurals) Thus, further failure to progress is even *likelier*.
*Eventually* either the body manages to get the baby out, somewhat despite the medical procedures, or a C-section is done. (The US has a hugely higher rate of C-sections than pretty much any other country in the world, including ones with just as high standards of living, and yet does not have a particularly outstandingly low infant mortality rate... hm)
The sad thing is that there are really quite a LOT of things that can be done to increase the chances of the body's being able to birth the baby in a minimally-risky maximally-good-outcome way. Midwives are trained in these sorts of things. Doctors and, generally, OB ward nurses, sadly, are *not*. (And some of the things are contrary to ubiquitous hospital policy anyhow.)
Mind, certainly sometimes situations DO arise where drugs or surgery really ARE necessary to save the mothers and/or baby's life. Absolutely for certain! And it is really really good that we have hospitals and doctors available for those sorts of things!
It's just unfortunate that, as useful as they are for rescuing the situation when things go wrong, doctors and hospitals tend to also PRODUCE things going wrong, because of practices based on tradition and convenience and sometimes contrary to good published evidence, while ignoring a bunch of things that would *help* babies be born smoothly.
There is a good book out there, I don't remember the exact title anymore but it contains the phrase "evidence-based" and is written by I think a small panel of doctors and reviews what common medical practices surrounding pregnancy and childbirth are, and aren't, supported by actual research study evidence. It is quite the eye opener. Henci Goer's work is also of interest, although she(?) is maybe a bit far out towards one end of the spectrum for some tastes
Sorry to be so longwinded, this si something I feel strongly about
Pat