patandchickens said:
davaroo said:
They have otehr ****ngs they are supposed to being doing on our behalf.
Indeedy the government always has lots of ****ngs goin' on...
I think that one's perspective on welfare and universal healthcare and so forth depends quite a lot, like hugely, on whether you're feeling grumpy about high taxes and thinking mainly about lazy-ass able-bodied freeloaders who could perfectly well take care of all their problems on their own if they would just get off their tushies... or whether you are thinking mainly about the people who simply need a legitimate temporary tide-me-over or have problems going on that are not their fault (like genuine disability, or a very serious medical problem in selves or children) and just really canNOT be solved by hard work.
It also depends on which you think is worse, supporting some parasites on the system for the sake of all those who legitimately need help, or leaving those who legitimately need help in the lurch for the sake of making sure that nobody can be a freeloader.
Sort of a Rorschach (sp?) test, and not everyone is going to see things the same way, nor do I expect they ever will or even *should*.
It is worth everybody TRYING to see the legitimacy of the other side of the argument, though. Stretching is good exercise
Pat, personally in favor of making sure those in need are taken care of, even if the system is unable to fully filter out the freeloaders (though the system could be trying harder, IMO)
The question is really whether you think it's the governments job to take care of
anybody.
You came into this world naked, you go out that way - what happens in between isn't the governments concern, it's yours.
For another view of this, I've been reading the Foxfire books lately, Most are familiar with these works, writings that would thrill any self-suffiency advocate with their honesty. One citation stuck in my head from just last night.
One of the interviewee's, and old woman was asked, "What do you think about the future."
Her response was that... "it will be bad day when we owe the government. When we are beholden to them, they will be able to take our lands and our rights and people wont be able to be free any more on their own land."
Some think that people need the government to take care of everyone, and we all should sacrifice what we have so that can happen. It's been a steady drumbeat since the turn of the 19th Century, and it starting to stick.
But I'm with the woman from the Foxfire book. Will we one day wake up and say, "O dang, we gave in too much. We cried for them to step in one too many times to solve our problems. Now we can't turn around, on land that was once ours, unless they tell us we can."
Some say we are, for all intents, already there.