Reducing expenses

lwheelr

Lovin' The Homestead
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
Points
79
Location
Texas Hill Country
Actually, we do ferment our bread ingredients. :)

Much of the Biblical bread was unleavened flat bread. Often it was nothing more than fairly freshly ground wheat, mixed with a little water and oil, and kneaded, flattened and baked on a rock. No fermentation, no sprouting.

They did sprout and ferment, but not exclusively.

And I would never ever recommend that people eat ANY bread from the grocery store, let alone large amounts. It doesn't qualify as Real Food in my book - even the "organic" stuff invariably has preservatives, and the flour in it is both refined, and aged. The "whole grains" are not whole at all, so all the benefits of good carbs are gone.

Yeah, I'm an elitist on that. I have a wheat mill - I can afford to be a bread snob. :)

To prove the theory that different combinations of calories affect the body differently, AND that different kinds of carbohydrates affect the body differently, you can try this experiment;

Eat a meal of 1/2 cup apple juice, 2 slices of white bread, 8 oz baked potato with the skin off, 1 cup of milk, 1 TBSP butter, and 4 oz (raw weight) baked chicken. This is supposed to be a meal that is large enough to measurably affect your blood sugar readings - 75 gm is the point at which this happens in a normal person, if you know you react to lower amounts, then by all means, eliminate a slice of bread, or the cup of milk.

Measure your blood sugar at half hour intervals after completing the meal - do this for 3 hours, or until the readings drop to 120 or lower (140 or lower if you know you are diabetic). Record the readings.

Wait 24 hours, and then eat a meal of 1 whole cored apple with the skin, 2 slices of homemade whole wheat bread, 8 oz baked potato with the skin, 1 cup milk, 1 TBSP butter, 4 oz (raw weight) chicken pan grilled in 1 tsp butter, and 2 cups salad greens with 2 TBSP salad dressing. (If you adjusted the foods in the first one, you need to adjust this one in the same way.) This is a larger meal, with more calories, and more grams of carbohydrate. All components are identical for purposes of the "carbs are carbs", or "calories in calories out" theory, but by substituting whole versions we see whether the type matters - by adding a salad, we see whether additional good carbs and calories can actually help.

Measure your blood sugar the same way, and compare the readings with the previous ones.

This kind of test will have other measurable results also - energy levels, presence or absence of heartburn, etc.

I've tested this many times, in varying combinations. When I was pregnant with my last daughter I had to control my gestational diabetes by diet alone after I became allergic to insulin, and I had a lot of time to log meals and blood sugar values, and to analyze the affect of various foods. The results were always that the larger whole food meal gives LOWER blood sugar results.

Now, that does not prove that using whole foods will help with weight loss, but it is highly suggestive that it will, since the blood sugar readings prove that it is affecting the metabolism and sugar use and storage systems differently.

Check it for yourself though, and see what happens on your own body.
 

abifae

Abinormal Butterfly
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
5,820
Reaction score
4
Points
198
Location
Colorado
lwheelr said:
Eat a meal of 1/2 cup apple juice, 2 slices of white bread, 8 oz baked potato with the skin off, 1 cup of milk, 1 TBSP butter, and 4 oz (raw weight) baked chicken.
That is over my daily sugar allowance. In one meal. And how can someone eat bread AND potatoes in the same meal? Wouldn't you just vomit it all up as too much food in a sitting??

Wait 24 hours, and then eat a meal of 1 whole cored apple with the skin, 2 slices of homemade whole wheat bread, 8 oz baked potato with the skin, 1 cup milk, 1 TBSP butter, 4 oz (raw weight) chicken pan grilled in 1 tsp butter, and 2 cups salad greens with 2 TBSP salad dressing.
Same issue. Couldn't ever eat that much OR that much sugar in one sitting.
 

abifae

Abinormal Butterfly
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
5,820
Reaction score
4
Points
198
Location
Colorado
ETA I have blood sugar tested on both types of meals and I crashed to 40 on both within a half hour and was sick. LOL. Maybe I'm special? I think it might have been interesting to also test insulin levels though. On low carb-high fat I'm steady at 70 :D
 

lwheelr

Lovin' The Homestead
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
Points
79
Location
Texas Hill Country
That's why I said to adjust. :)

People are funny about carbs. I heard a woman say, "I'm supposed to eat 150 grams of carbohydrates the day before I have my glucose tolerance test. My gosh I can't eat that much in ONE DAY! I couldn't figure out how to load my carb meals that much. I just went and got a burger and fries and Coke for dinner, but I have NO IDEA how I'm gonna get that much carb into me in ONE DAY!"

She just did that in ONE MEAL and was totally clueless! I laughed at that and didn't bother to clue her in, she would not have believed me.

Most people have to get up to 75 gms in a meal before they can measure a difference in blood sugar readings. People with blood sugar imbalances are usually a lot more sensitive, reacting anywhere from 30 to 60 gms. My limit used to be 30, now it is 75 or more. Not that I do that usually - I don't. But right now if I get in a situation where I'm low on potassium, niacin, A, and calcium at the same time, I can eat whatever I need to boost all of them at once. No more juggling.
 

Wifezilla

Low-Carb Queen - RIP: 1963-2021
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
8,928
Reaction score
16
Points
270
Location
Colorado
And I would never ever recommend that people eat ANY bread from the grocery store, let alone large amounts. It doesn't qualify as Real Food in my book - even the "organic" stuff invariably has preservatives, and the flour in it is both refined, and aged. The "whole grains" are not whole at all, so all the benefits of good carbs are gone.

Yeah, I'm an elitist on that. I have a wheat mill - I can afford to be a bread snob
:thumbsup

Now, that does not prove that using whole foods will help with weight loss, but it is highly suggestive that it will, since the blood sugar readings prove that it is affecting the metabolism and sugar use and storage systems differently.

Check it for yourself though, and see what happens on your own body.
This is exactly the way to do it. I got a free glucose meter last year when there was a coupon in the paper :D

With me there is not much difference, but that is the genetic component. Too much damage was done over the years. Everyone's ability to mitigate the damage caused by carbohydrates is different, but carbohydrates (especially refined ones) are inherently damaging.

When I eat carbs they are in the form of leafy greens, a cucumber, an apple, the minimal carbs naturally found in meat, the rare sweet potato, etc... With those foods, the nutrition density more than compensates for the carbohydrates.

With breads, pastas, etc... unless they are preparing them like you and freemotion do (sprouting, fermenting, etc...), they are so nutritionally deficient, they have to be artificially enriched. Sadly, few people know the difference between REAL bread and modern bread and think switching to whole wheat will help.

The blood sugar experiment is a good one to do and another good one is to track your carb intake for a few days. Don't change what you (or your child) normally eats, just keep track. Then use a free site like www.fitday.com and enter the food. How many carbs did you eat? For every 50g of carbs you are eating the equivalent of 1/4 cup of sugar. How many cups of sugar did you eat? Many people are shocked to see it in the 3 cup range. Wrapping that sugar in artificial enrichment doesn't make it any healthier. It's still sugar. May as well stick a Flintstones Vitamin inside a Twinkie!
:gig
 

Wifezilla

Low-Carb Queen - RIP: 1963-2021
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
8,928
Reaction score
16
Points
270
Location
Colorado
Oh, and to get to the point of how this relates to reducing expensive, the less damage you do to your body the less it costs to maintain it.
 

abifae

Abinormal Butterfly
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
5,820
Reaction score
4
Points
198
Location
Colorado
lwheelr said:
Most people have to get up to 75 gms in a meal before they can measure a difference in blood sugar readings. People with blood sugar imbalances are usually a lot more sensitive, reacting anywhere from 30 to 60 gms. My limit used to be 30, now it is 75 or more. Not that I do that usually - I don't. But right now if I get in a situation where I'm low on potassium, niacin, A, and calcium at the same time, I can eat whatever I need to boost all of them at once. No more juggling.
For a long time, my blood sugar wouldn't go high enough to measure on the hospital equipment until I'd had a full cup of OJ, and about 5 sets of graham crackers/peanut butter. I was working in medical records and my shaking made them sit me down and test me... and then feed me in a panic til I registered. LOL. And then I got poked regularly. Never did manage to register easily. :hu

I thought maybe my blood just had something in it that didn't read right. *giggles*

Now I eat more carefully and don't eat many grains (I do have a local store that grinds their own wheat and sour doughs it that I have less issue with!!! WOOT!) and avoid potatoes and other starchy things. But I can have a bowl of peas with butter and not get sick now so I'm definitely handling sugar better!!!

But my body still goes with the sugar is sugar plan on producing its insulin.

But now that I eat on my insulin resets (ie as near 0 carbs a day as I can get for as many days as I can last - usually 3) I have to buy food. I used to just not eat for 72 hours. This way costs more!!!! I used to also do it weekly or biweekly >.>

Oh well. My diet is my health insurance, right?

*examines her budget*
 

AnnaRaven

Lovin' The Homestead
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
861
Reaction score
0
Points
78
Making your own food (including your own bread, etc) will lower your grocery costs. And it tends to be healthier for you.

A lot of folks suggest sticking to the outside edges of the grocery store - where they tend to keep the ingredients, rather than the prepared foods.

Whether you subscribe to low-carb or not, just remember that you do need to get your good fats, sufficient protein and good carbs in some form. Do what works for your family. Exercise is also good for you - not in substitution for eating well, but in addition to it. Being inactive is not good for your body.

Good luck on reducing your grocery costs and let us know what's working for you!
 

AnnaRaven

Lovin' The Homestead
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
861
Reaction score
0
Points
78
Wifezilla said:
As for exercise as a cure-all, it isn't. The science on that doesn't wash either.
http://nymag.com/news/sports/38001/
Who ever said exercise is a cure-all?

I am not going to stop busting diet myths that kept me (and apparently about 40% of Americans in general) sick and unhealthy for a good deal of my life.

There are very specific mechanisms your body uses to handle the different macronutrients. It should be common knowledge but it isn't.
Low-carb is also not a "cure-all" (<--your word). Reminding people to not overdo carbs is fine, and that some people get good results from low-carb is fine, but I've only been here, what, 2 weeks, and I've already read enough about your low-carb campaign to be royally sick of it.

Not everyone wants to do low-carb. Period. My DH (who grew up in Italy) would rather be dead than low-carb. Literally. To him, never having pasta again would not be worth living. We've had the discussion after he was diagnosed in the US with diabetes 2. So to find out what works for him was necessary. We found out that he has to avoid the asian foods that are cooked with evaporated cane juice. (It was after he'd been eating at the asian cafe at work for a year that he got diagnosed.) He does fine with reasonable levels of pasta (2 oz of regular, 3 oz of whole wheat in a meal). We know what works for him because we've measured his blood sugar to find out - sometimes 10 times a day when we were first figuring stuff out. And we managed to get his A1C levels down from 9(very high) in May to 6(normal) in September. So we know what works for him and what doesn't.

Finding out what works for you and your body is important. And remembering that people vary. For me, exercise matters. Doesn't matter how I'm eating if I'm not also exercising because my body reacts badly to lack of activity. If I don't do some level of stretching, cardio, and strength training, regularly, my body starts falling apart. I have learned to do yoga in self-defense. I found out that my knees and back are much happier when I'm doing weight-lifting. It's when I get busy or lazy and stop getting exercise that I end up at the doctor with bursitis in my hip and my neck outta whack etc. Not due to being overweight (I'm not) but due to being out of shape. My body works better when I use it.

So yeah - calories in, calories out isn't the *end* of the story, but it is part of the story. What kind of food you eat is also part of the story but not the whole story. Same with exercise. It's called having a holistic view of the body and lifestyle, not simplistic or reductionist.

ETA: I am not unsympathetic to low-carbing, btw, just to it being an argument on every thread. Isn't it possible to just create a "low-carb pros and cons" thread and point to it whenever you and others want to discuss it? That way it doesn't take over other threads.
 

lwheelr

Lovin' The Homestead
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
569
Reaction score
0
Points
79
Location
Texas Hill Country
Activity levels are important. I mean, if you look at history, the people who had problems with high weight were the rich who had servants to wait on them. The average lower income person rarely did - and it wasn't just an issue of not being able to afford excess food, it was high activity levels.

I think "exercise" is a fallacy. I think it is just like food supplements. A replacement for something better, made necessary by a modern life which lacks sufficient physical action. Hard work is the best thing.

This is why our long term plan is a large enough property to have to walk a lot, and why bucking hay is part of what we consider to be necessary labor.

I don't want to have to spend half an hour to an hour of useless time every day replacing what I should be getting from the daily labor.
 
Top