patandchickens
Crazy Cat Lady
one thing I was reflecting on this afternoon, on a monotonous drive home from the zoo splash park with two sleeping kids in the back seat, was how much of a REASON there is for the very stringent truth-in-labelling and consumer-and-food-safety laws in the US and other developed countries.
It isn't that way 'just in case'
You don't have to go back very far at all - fifty, a hundred years - to find all sorts of mindboggling things being merchanted with utter disregard for their effects on consumers. Poisons as medicines, toxic adulterants in foods, etcetera etcetera etcetera. I don't mean things that weren't known at the time to be harmful - I mean all the MANY MANY MANY times where the seller knew darn well what they were doing but it made extra profit and they weren't likely to get punished so why not.
If you think this impulse is extinct in modern America/Canada/etc, I would suggest you look at parts of the construction industry and related trades -- while there are very upright reputable hardworking honest construction firms, there are also an amazing number of fly-by-night rip-em-off-then-change-your-company's-name-and-do-it-again outfits knocking around out there.
The only difference I see between the US/Canada/etc versus "those other" countries that are being referred to as sources of harmful or contaminated products is, we've had longer to get our butts in action to draft laws against that sort of thing. Domestically anyhow. US/Canadian/etc companies can still sell all sorts of things overseas that are considered too harmful to sell domestically :/
One theory of the development of human society and civilization is that it is (in part) a general progress in which more and more people get included in your "us" category as opposed to your "them" category. I think there is some real truth in this. And I think it is much more useful to consider us ALL as us, rather than draw lines on a map to decide who's more important to ya.
JMO,
Pat
It isn't that way 'just in case'
You don't have to go back very far at all - fifty, a hundred years - to find all sorts of mindboggling things being merchanted with utter disregard for their effects on consumers. Poisons as medicines, toxic adulterants in foods, etcetera etcetera etcetera. I don't mean things that weren't known at the time to be harmful - I mean all the MANY MANY MANY times where the seller knew darn well what they were doing but it made extra profit and they weren't likely to get punished so why not.
If you think this impulse is extinct in modern America/Canada/etc, I would suggest you look at parts of the construction industry and related trades -- while there are very upright reputable hardworking honest construction firms, there are also an amazing number of fly-by-night rip-em-off-then-change-your-company's-name-and-do-it-again outfits knocking around out there.
The only difference I see between the US/Canada/etc versus "those other" countries that are being referred to as sources of harmful or contaminated products is, we've had longer to get our butts in action to draft laws against that sort of thing. Domestically anyhow. US/Canadian/etc companies can still sell all sorts of things overseas that are considered too harmful to sell domestically :/
One theory of the development of human society and civilization is that it is (in part) a general progress in which more and more people get included in your "us" category as opposed to your "them" category. I think there is some real truth in this. And I think it is much more useful to consider us ALL as us, rather than draw lines on a map to decide who's more important to ya.
JMO,
Pat