- Thread starter
- #951
There are programs that pay farmers to let fields lay fallow, but that's certainly not the only agricultural subsidy. I think it's time for someone to go check agricultural stubsidies article in McWickipedia.CrimsonRose said:yeah we have a lot of farmers around here that leave their fields empty and get a Gov't check! but I don't know of any that get paid to grow it... unless they sell it to customers... I don't know any farms where the gov't buys the crop... (Unless there is some fuel program where they buy corn... but I don't know of any of our local farmers taking part in that here) So if the fields sit empty there is a lower supply and higher demand the prices stay higher not lower... so that way the farmers who do grow the crop make enough to live off of...k0xxx said:Actually, I believe the opposite is true. I have not seen where food is subsidized to make it lower. The government pays farmers NOT to grow some foods, so that the prices WILL NOT be lower. They were originally intended to subsidize small farmers' income during periods of low prices, and to artificially reduce the amount of certain crops on the market in an effort to raise prices.k15n1 said:. . . And BTW, the low price of food is a federal policy, so whether you like big or small government, keep that in mind.
You really are not going to convince me that food prices are low right now and that anyone not affording groceries is just deluded.k15n1 said:Food prices are much lower that they were in the early 1900s. Agricultural subsidies changed in the 1970s, driving down the cost of food. Read about the policy changes under the leadership of Ed Butz, if you're interested.
If you factor inflation into the price and median income, food costs the average person less now than before the major changes in agricultural policy that took place in the 1970s.abifae said:You really are not going to convince me that food prices are low right now and that anyone not affording groceries is just deluded.k15n1 said:Food prices are much lower that they were in the early 1900s. Agricultural subsidies changed in the 1970s, driving down the cost of food. Read about the policy changes under the leadership of Ed Butz, if you're interested.
Agian with the Wiki? is that where you get all your info from? because as I stated earlier it's a public forum... Anyone can say whatever they like there doesn't make it 100% true... Not saying it's all bad but not 100% trustworthy....k15n1 said:There are programs that pay farmers to let fields lay fallow, but that's certainly not the only agricultural subsidy. I think it's time for someone to go check agricultural stubsidies article in McWickipedia.
That's basically what I've been asking too and notice how that part goes unanswered and is ignored... He keeps going back to prices from years ago without any substantial backing....Wifezilla said:And that changes how rising food prices effect average families now in what way?!??!
Historical facts about agricultural subsidies are not issues in the current political debates. Not that I know of, at least. I wish they were talking about something practical like that. Let's not make this political, or the thread'll get shut down.Wifezilla said:And that changes how rising food prices effect average families now in what way?!??!
Do you work for the Obama administration or something?